AI at school: for and against

Egen text · Åk 4–9

Read an article about artificial intelligence in schools. Then write a balanced discussion with your own conclusion, and revise it.

Så fungerar det

We want to discuss a question fairly before giving our view. A discursive text presents arguments for and against, each supported by a reason or an example, and ends with a conclusion where the writer weighs them up.

Useful structures: On the one hand … On the other hand …; One advantage is … A major drawback is …; While it is true that …, it is also important to remember that … Keep a neutral tone in the body and save I believe for the conclusion.

On the one hand, AI tools can explain a difficult topic instantly. On the other hand, they sometimes give answers that sound right but are wrong.

Homework helper or shortcut?

When chatbots that can write essays, solve equations and explain history in seconds became widely available, many teachers were worried. Would pupils stop thinking for themselves? A few years later, the picture is more complicated than either the enthusiasts or the critics predicted. Supporters point out that AI tools can act like a patient personal tutor. A pupil who is stuck on a maths problem at nine in the evening can ask for a hint instead of giving up. Pupils who find writing difficult can get feedback on the structure of a text before they hand it in. For pupils learning in a second language, an AI tool can explain a word or a grammar point in a way that suits them. Critics, however, raise several concerns. The most obvious is cheating: if a program writes your essay, you have not learnt to write. A less obvious problem is accuracy. Language models produce text that sounds confident, but they can invent facts, quotes and even sources. A pupil who does not already know the subject may not notice. There are also questions about privacy, because what users type is often stored by the companies behind the tools. Many schools have therefore moved from banning AI to teaching pupils how to use it responsibly. In some classrooms, pupils are asked to compare an AI answer with a textbook and find its mistakes. In others, they must show their notes and drafts, so that the teacher can follow their thinking. Perhaps the most useful question is not whether AI should be used at school, but what pupils still need to be able to do without it. That question may decide what school looks like in the future.

Källor

  1. Kursplan i engelska, Lgr22, Skolverket